# Problem Definition

## 1.1 The Liquidity Paradox of Alternative Assets

The alternative asset market exceeds $13 trillion, yet its on-chain adoption faces fundamental barriers.

### Limitations of Traditional Frameworks

* **Ambiguous Rights Chain**: Unclear mapping between on-chain tokens and off-chain legal entitlements
* **Valuation Black Box**: NAV relies on infrequent external audits, causing severe information asymmetry
* **Exit Friction**: Quarterly/annual redemption windows conflict with DeFi's 24/7 trading expectations

### Challenges of Existing RWA Protocols

| Solution Type            | Representative Projects | Issue                                                          |
| ------------------------ | ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Pure compliance approach | Securitize              | Extremely poor liquidity; secondary market exists in name only |
| Pure DeFi approach       | Early RWA pools         | Lacks real asset backing, unsustainable returns                |
| Hybrid approach          | Most Projects           | Neither here nor there—neither compliant nor liquid            |

## 1.2 Paimon's Design Trade-offs

Paimon does not pursue the goal of enabling all assets to "exit instantly like ETH"—the nature of alternative assets makes this objective unfeasible.

### Core Principles

1. **Liquidity is a budget, not a right**: Instant exit is a limited resource that must be rationally allocated through cost mechanisms
2. **Weakly Coupled Pricing**: The intrinsic value (NAV) of PPs and market price (P\_mkt) are permitted to diverge, converging under controlled rules
3. **Transparency over promises**: Publicly disclose all liquidity budgets and queue statuses, allowing the market to price risk premiums autonomously

### Design Philosophy

```
Traditional Approach:
Asset → Token → "Instant Liquidity" (Promise)
         ↓
      Failure when stressed

Paimon Approach:
Asset → Token → Tiered Liquidity (Budget-based)
         ↓
      Sustainable under stress
```

The key insight is that **alternative assets cannot and should not promise instant liquidity**. Instead, Paimon creates a transparent, rules-based system where:

* Users understand the liquidity constraints upfront
* The cost of liquidity reflects its true scarcity
* Market participants can price risk appropriately
* The system remains stable under redemption pressure


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://paimon-finance.gitbook.io/paimon.finance/overview/problem-definition.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.