Tranche Vault (Phase 2)

Design Motivation

The underlying asset yield in the PP is approximately 6% APY. This is a real, exogenous yield, yet it lacks appeal in the DeFi market.

Core challenge: How to offer higher yields to risk-seeking users without increasing underlying asset risk?

Solution: Yield Tranching — Allowing some users to bear greater risk in exchange for leveraged returns.

Tranche Vault Structure

Tranche Vault is an independent contract layer built on top of PP, splitting PP's yield into two tranches:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                          Tranche Vault                           │
│            (Independent Contract, Holds PP as Assets)            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│   Users deposit PP                                              │
│        │                                                        │
│        ↓                                                        │
│   Choose share class                                            │
│        │                                                        │
│   ┌────┴────┐                                                   │
│   ↓         ↓                                                   │
│  sPP      jPP                                                 │
│ Senior    Junior                                                │
│                                                                 │
│ • Fixed 4% yield*    • Floating yield (all residual)             │
│ • Senior repayment   • Subordinated repayment                    │
│ • Lower risk         • Higher risk, higher upside                │
│ • No governance      • Can stake to earn esPAIMON                │
│                                                                 │
│ * The 4% fixed rate is a governance-adjustable parameter.       │
│   Rate changes require Medium Risk governance approval and      │
│   apply only to new deposits after the change takes effect.     │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Yield Distribution Mechanism

Allocation Priority: sPP receives fixed returns first, while jPP receives the remaining portion.

Formula

Let V represent the total value of PP held by the Vault, r_s denote the proportion of sPP, r_j = 1 − r_s denote the proportion of jPP, and Y_total denote the total yield of PP.

  • Y_sPP = 4% (Fixed)

YjPP=YtotalYsPPrsrjY_{jPP}=\frac{Y_{total}-Y_{sPP}\cdot r_s}{r_j}

Scenario Analysis (Assuming sPP:jPP = 70:30)

Total PP Return
sPP Yield
jPP Return
Explanation

10%

4%

24%

Bull Market, jPP Gains Significant Leverage

8%

4%

17.3%

Normal preference

6%

4%

10.7%

Base Scenario

4%

4%

4%

Break-even point

2%

4%

-2.7%

jPP begins to incur losses

0%

4%

-9.3%

jPP bears all downside risk

Key Features: jPP provides a safety cushion for sPP, absorbing downside volatility; in return, jPP gains leveraged returns during uptrends.

Epoch Settlement Mechanism

PP's NAV fluctuates continuously, while Tranche Vault employs fixed-cycle settlements:

Settlement Steps

  1. At the end of each Epoch, calculate the change in PP NAV held by the Vault

  2. Calculate sPP's earned yield: 4% ÷ 52 × r_s × V_s

  3. The remaining amount (positive or negative) is fully allocated to jPP

  4. If the remainder is negative, deduct it from the net value of jPP shares

Entries and Exits

Deposit

Operation
Rule

PP → sPP

Anytime, calculated based on current Vault net value

PP → jPP

At any time, calculate shares based on current Vault NAV

Redemption

Operation
Rules

sPP → PP

Queued redemption, with priority over jPP

jPP → PP

Queued redemption, lower priority than sPP

Staked jPP

Must first unstake

Priority Repayment Implementation

Risk Control: Junior Layer Safety Buffer

Issue: If the jPP ratio is too low, it cannot provide sufficient protection for sPP.

Mechanism: Minimum Junior Ratio Constraint

Parameters
Value
Description

Target Junior Ratio

30%

System Design Target

Minimum Junior Ratio

20%

Mandatory Lower Limit

Trigger Action

Pause new sPP deposits

Prevent excessive leverage

Resumption Criteria

Junior ratio returns to 25%

Includes buffer range

Extreme Scenario

If PP NAV continues to decline, causing jPP NAV to reach zero:

  1. jPP holders lose all principal

  2. sPP begins directly bearing PP downside risk

  3. At this point, sPP effectively degrades to a standard PP exposure

  4. Emergency state is triggered, suspending all new deposits

Integration with Governance System

Incentive acquisition path (non-governance): jPP staking incentives → esPAIMON (vesting) → PAIMON.

Governance participation requires PAIMON locked into vePAIMON.

Comparison with Failure Modes

Dimension
Terra/Anchor
Paimon Tranche

Revenue Sources

Token Subsidies (Endogenous)

Underlying Assets + Tiered Amplification (Exogenous)

High-Yield Mechanism

Money Printing

Risk redistribution

Downside Protection

None

jPP as a Safety Net

Liquidation risk

Death spiral

No Lending, No Liquidation

Worst-case scenario

Systemic Collapse

jPP becomes worthless, sPP degrades to PP

Last updated