Tranche Vault (Phase 2)
Phase 2 Concept — Not Deployed
This document describes a future design. There is no Tranche Vault contract on BSC mainnet today and no sPP / jPP / esPAIMON token has been issued. The entire mechanism below (Senior/Junior split, Epoch settlement, esPAIMON staking incentive) is a design proposal subject to change.
For products that are live on mainnet today, see:
Paimon Prime Vault (PP) — ERC-4626 RWA fund
Pre-IPO SPV Tokens (pSPCX / xSPCX) — SpaceX SPV tokenization
Design Motivation
The underlying asset yield in the PP is approximately 6% APY. This is a real, exogenous yield, yet it lacks appeal in the DeFi market.
Core challenge: How to offer higher yields to risk-seeking users without increasing underlying asset risk?
Solution: Yield Tranching — Allowing some users to bear greater risk in exchange for leveraged returns.
Tranche Vault Structure
Tranche Vault is an independent contract layer built on top of PP, splitting PP's yield into two tranches:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Tranche Vault │
│ (Independent Contract, Holds PP as Assets) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Users deposit PP │
│ │ │
│ ↓ │
│ Choose share class │
│ │ │
│ ┌────┴────┐ │
│ ↓ ↓ │
│ sPP jPP │
│ Senior Junior │
│ │
│ • Fixed 4% yield* • Floating yield (all residual) │
│ • Senior repayment • Subordinated repayment │
│ • Lower risk • Higher risk, higher upside │
│ • No governance • Can stake to earn esPAIMON │
│ │
│ * The 4% fixed rate is a governance-adjustable parameter. │
│ Rate changes require Medium Risk governance approval and │
│ apply only to new deposits after the change takes effect. │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Yield Distribution Mechanism
Allocation Priority: sPP receives fixed returns first, while jPP receives the remaining portion.
Formula
Let V represent the total value of PP held by the Vault, r_s denote the proportion of sPP, r_j = 1 − r_s denote the proportion of jPP, and Y_total denote the total yield of PP.
Y_sPP = 4% (Fixed)
Scenario Analysis (Assuming sPP:jPP = 70:30)
10%
4%
24%
Bull Market, jPP Gains Significant Leverage
8%
4%
17.3%
Normal preference
6%
4%
10.7%
Base Scenario
4%
4%
4%
Break-even point
2%
4%
-2.7%
jPP begins to incur losses
0%
4%
-9.3%
jPP bears all downside risk
Key Features: jPP provides a safety cushion for sPP, absorbing downside volatility; in return, jPP gains leveraged returns during uptrends.
Epoch Settlement Mechanism
PP's NAV fluctuates continuously, while Tranche Vault employs fixed-cycle settlements:
Settlement Steps
At the end of each Epoch, calculate the change in PP NAV held by the Vault
Calculate sPP's earned yield: 4% ÷ 52 × r_s × V_s
The remaining amount (positive or negative) is fully allocated to jPP
If the remainder is negative, deduct it from the net value of jPP shares
Entries and Exits
Deposit
PP → sPP
Anytime, calculated based on current Vault net value
PP → jPP
At any time, calculate shares based on current Vault NAV
Redemption
sPP → PP
Queued redemption, with priority over jPP
jPP → PP
Queued redemption, lower priority than sPP
Staked jPP
Must first unstake
Priority Repayment Implementation
Risk Control: Junior Layer Safety Buffer
Issue: If the jPP ratio is too low, it cannot provide sufficient protection for sPP.
Mechanism: Minimum Junior Ratio Constraint
Target Junior Ratio
30%
System Design Target
Minimum Junior Ratio
20%
Mandatory Lower Limit
Trigger Action
Pause new sPP deposits
Prevent excessive leverage
Resumption Criteria
Junior ratio returns to 25%
Includes buffer range
Extreme Scenario
If PP NAV continues to decline, causing jPP NAV to reach zero:
jPP holders lose all principal
sPP begins directly bearing PP downside risk
At this point, sPP effectively degrades to a standard PP exposure
Emergency state is triggered, suspending all new deposits
Integration with Governance System
Incentive acquisition path (non-governance): jPP staking incentives → esPAIMON (vesting) → PAIMON.
Governance participation requires PAIMON locked into vePAIMON.
Comparison with Failure Modes
Revenue Sources
Token Subsidies (Endogenous)
Underlying Assets + Tiered Amplification (Exogenous)
High-Yield Mechanism
Money Printing
Risk redistribution
Downside Protection
None
jPP as a Safety Net
Liquidation risk
Death spiral
No Lending, No Liquidation
Worst-case scenario
Systemic Collapse
jPP becomes worthless, sPP degrades to PP
Last updated